SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(Cal) 343

NARAYAN CHANDRA SIL
ANUKUL CHANDRA MAITY – Appellant
Versus
RENUKA RANI PRODHAN – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Amit Baran Das, DEBASIS KAR GUPTA, SUDHAKAR BISWAS

Narayan Chandra Sil

( 1 ) THIS is to consider a revisional application under Article 227 of the constitution of India which is directed against Order No. 19 dated 3. 1. 2004 passed by Sri P. K. Roy, District Delegate in the Court of District Delegate, tamluk in connection with J/misc. Case No. 49 of 1973 arising out of an application for Probate of a Will under Section 276 of the Indian Succession act.

( 2 ) IT appears from the order impugned that the ma n dispute relates to the payment of Court Fees in granting probate. In the instant case, what happened is that the petitioner filed an application for granting probate in the year 1978 and on 25. 2. 1978 the learned District Delegate passed the ex-pane order to the effect that the applicant not the probate of the Will (Exbt. 1) executed by the testator, Sashi Bhusan Maity since deceased. Thereafter, no step was taken by the petitioner for grant of probate and it was only in 2004 the petitioner came before the Court with a prayer to grant probate. The learned District Delegate in such circumstances passed in order on 16. 5. 2003 directing for writing a letter to the Collector in order to submit a report regarding the valuation of t















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top