SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(Cal) 717

SUBHRO KAMAL MUKHERJEE
PARESH CHANDRA NATH – Appellant
Versus
NARESH CHANDRA NATH – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
BHUDEV BHATTACHARYA, INDRANIL BHATTACHARYA, Raja Roy chaudhary, Ramesh Bhattacharya

SUBHRO KAMAL MUKHERJEE, J.

( 1 ) THIS is an application under Article 227 of the Constitution of India against judgment and order dated November 30, 2004 passed by the learned District judge, Cooch Behar in Miscellaneous Appeal No. 3 of 2004 reversing the Order no. 9 dated February 26, 2004 passed by the learned Civil Judge (Junior division) at Tufanganj, District: Cooch Behar in Title Suit No. 7 of 2003.

( 2 ) THE plaintiff/opposite party No. 1 institutes this Title Suit No. 7 of 2003 in the Court of the learned Civil Judge (Junior Division) at Tufanganj, inter alia, for declaration of the title of the plaintiff in respect of the suit property and for a declaration that the registered deed of gift, executed on January 6, 2001 and registered on January 9, 2001, is fraudulent, false and no title was transferred by the said document in favour of the defendant No. 1 and for setting aside of the said deed. The plaintiff, also, prays for further declaration that the defendant No. 1 had no saleable interest in the suit property and, as such, transfers made by him in favour of the defendant Nos. 2 to 8 are all illegal and void and not binding on the plaintiff. The plaintiff prays for pe












Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top