SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2009 Supreme(Cal) 811

SANJIB BANERJEE
PRIME TIMBERS PVT. LTD – Appellant
Versus
STATE BANK OF INDIA – Respondent


Advocates: A.DAS GUPTA, A.K.ROUTH, JISHNU CHOWDHURY, Noelle Dey, S.PAL CHOWDHURY

( 1 ) THE reliefs claimed in the suit have been reproduced at paragraph 37 of the petition:

" (a) The letter notice dated March 24, 2009 being Annexure "i" hereof be adjudged null and void and be delivered up and cancelled; (b) Perpetual injunction restraining the respondent from acting contrary to or in any manner inconsistent with terms of the agreement between the parties as recorded in paragraph 16 above and from effecting recoveries in a manner contrary thereto; (c) Alternatively decree for determination of the amounts due and payable by the petitioner to the respondent and a decree be made for such sum as may be found upon enquiry, in favour of the respondent; (d) Receiver; (e) Injunction; (f) Attachment; (g) Costs; (h) Such further and/or other relief or reliefs".

( 2 ) BY a letter dated February 28, 2009 the defendant bank issued notice under Section 13 (2) of Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of security Interest Act, 2002. The bank put the plaintiff on notice in terms of Section 13 (2)of the Act that the constituent was not to transfer by way of sale, lease or otherwise the secured assets detailed in schedule 'c' to the notice without ob

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top