SANJIB BANERJEE
PRIME TIMBERS PVT. LTD – Appellant
Versus
STATE BANK OF INDIA – Respondent
" (a) The letter notice dated March 24, 2009 being Annexure "i" hereof be adjudged null and void and be delivered up and cancelled; (b) Perpetual injunction restraining the respondent from acting contrary to or in any manner inconsistent with terms of the agreement between the parties as recorded in paragraph 16 above and from effecting recoveries in a manner contrary thereto; (c) Alternatively decree for determination of the amounts due and payable by the petitioner to the respondent and a decree be made for such sum as may be found upon enquiry, in favour of the respondent; (d) Receiver; (e) Injunction; (f) Attachment; (g) Costs; (h) Such further and/or other relief or reliefs".
( 2 ) BY a letter dated February 28, 2009 the defendant bank issued notice under Section 13 (2) of Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of security Interest Act, 2002. The bank put the plaintiff on notice in terms of Section 13 (2)of the Act that the constituent was not to transfer by way of sale, lease or otherwise the secured assets detailed in schedule 'c' to the notice without ob
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.