PRASENJIT MANDAL
Arati Naskar – Appellant
Versus
Keshorimohan Naskar – Respondent
Prasenjit Mandal, J:
1. This is application under Section 401 read with Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 arising out of an order dated 27.12.2005 passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate, Second Court, Diamond Harbour, District – South 24 Parganas in Misc. Case No.282 of 2003 thereby allowing the maintenance in favour of the wife at the rate of Rs.1,250/- per month from the date of filing of the application under Section 125 of the Cr.P.C. Being aggrieved by the said order of maintenance, the wife has preferred this revisional application. The fact leading to the filing of the revisional application is that the wife/petitioner filed an application under Section 125 of the Cr.P.C. against the husband/opposite party before the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Diamond Harbour praying for maintenance in favour of the wife at the rate of Rs.1,500/-per month for herself and Rs.1,500/- per month for each of her two children, thus, totalling Rs.4,500/- per month and the litigation cost of Rs.5,000/-. Admittedly, the marriage between the two was held in April, 1978 according to Hindu customs and rites and after marriage they lived together and two
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.