SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2011 Supreme(Cal) 322

HARISH TANDAN
Dara Singh – Appellant
Versus
Chanda Kaur Singh – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner:Mr. Gopal Chandra Ghosh, Advocate.
For the Respondent:Mr. Dulal Chandra Roy, Mr. A.K. Das, Advocates.

JUDGMENT :

HARISH TANDON, J.

This revisional application is directed against an order no. 218 dated May 11, 2006 passed by Sri P.K. Chakraborty, learned Judge, 2nd Bench, City Civil Court at Kolkata in Title Suit no. 1003 of 1976. This case has a chequered history. The litigation started sometimes in the year 1967 with the initiation of the suit being Title Suit No. 6 of 1967 filed by the opposite party no. 12, Life Corporation of India against one Sarjan Singh, the original defendant no. 2 in the instant suit treating him as trespasser and claiming recovery of possession. The said suit was decreed. The predecessor-in-interest of the present petitioners instituted title suit no. 1003 of 1976 against the Life Corporation of India as principle defendant and incorporated one Sarjan Singh and Punaya Singh as the defendant no. 2 and 3. The relief claimed in the said suit was in respect of a tenancy belonging to the premises of the Life Corporation of India which was initially held by one Pujan Singh who being bachelor and having died intestate, the tenancy was inherited by the original plaintiff along with the original defendant no. 2 and 3 being the brothers. Further declaration was sou






Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top