Syamal Kanti Chakrabarti, J.

In the instant application under Section 401 read with Section 482 Cr.P.C the judgment and order dated 22.12.2009 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court-I, Dinhata, Cooch Behar in Sessions Trial No. 2(v) of 2009 and Sessions Case No. 93 of 2009 arising out of Dinhata P. S. Case No. 65/08 dated 25.02.2008 under Section 498A/306 of the Indian Penal Code has been assailed. By the judgment and order the learned trial Judge acquitted the accused opposite party of all charges. Being aggrieved by and dissatisfied with such findings the de facto complainant has preferred this application contending inter alia, that the findings of the learned Trial Judge is perverse in as much as he has failed to appreciate the evidence adduced by the prosecution to prove the allegation of abatement by the relatives to commit suicide on demand of dowry followed by subsequent torture. It is contended that there are sufficient evidene on record to show that the victim was ill-treated which will be reflected from the individual role played by the accused persons in abetting the victim to commit suicide. From the conduct of the accused persons