BHASKAR BHATTACHARYA, TAPAN KUMAR DUTT
Sushil Kumar Agarwal – Appellant
Versus
Kalidas Sadhu – Respondent
BHASKAR BHATTACHARYA, J.
(1) This first appeal is at the instance of a plaintiff in a suit for specific performance of contract and is directed against the judgment and decree dated 28th February, 2007, passed by the learned Judge, Second Bench, City Civil Court at Calcutta, in Title Suit No.1150 of 2003 thereby dismissing the said suit on the sole ground that the suit, being one for specific performance of a contract for construction of building, was not maintainable in view of the provisions contained in Section 14(3)(c) of the Specific Relief Act.
(2) Being dissatisfied, the plaintiff has come up with the present appeal.
(3) The plaintiff/appellant filed the aforesaid suit initially claiming the following relief: "a) Leave under Order II Rule 2 of the Code of Civil Procedure. b) A decree for declaration that the alleged letter dated 19th May, 2003 purportedly issued on behalf of the defendant has no force in the eye of law and is not binding on the parties. c) A decree for permanent injunction restraining the defendant, his men, agents, servants and employees from encumbering the said premises No.243N, Acharya Prafulla Chandra Road, P.S.- Burtolla, Kolkata as described
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.