SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2009 Supreme(Cal) 42

ARUNABHA BASU
Farid Mallik – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF WEST BENGAL – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appearing Parties:Jaymalya Bagchi, S. Bhagat, Ranjit Ghosal, Advocates.

Judgment :-

(1) The revisional application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure is directed to quash proceeding in connection with Case No. 155 of 2005 arising out of Contai Police Station Case No. 66 of 2005 under Sections 406/471/468/420 of the Indian Penal Code, now pending before the Court of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Contai.

(2) It appears from the documents filed along with the application, that police officer after conducting investigation submitted charge sheet against the petitioners herein for commission of offence punishable under Section 406 of the Indian Penal Code. The First Information Report in this case was lodged by one Inspector, DIO-III, Contai, on the basis of allegation of execution of power of attorney in favour of the petitioner herein by the Opposite Party No. 2. The said power of attorney was executed by the O.P. No. 2 in favour of the petitioner herein, in view of the relationship between the petitioner with the Opposite Party No. 2. Under the said power of attorney a copy of which is annexed along with the revisional application, petitioner herein was entrusted over certain immovable properties of the O.P. No. 2. The sai













Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top