SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2009 Supreme(Cal) 224

BHASKAR BHATTACHARYA, TAPAN KUMAR DUTT
Asharani Das – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appearing Parties:Parimal Kumar Dwari,Kazi M. Rahaman, Soumendra Nath Das, Advocates.

Judgment :

BHASKAR BHATTACHARYA, J.

(1) This first appeal is at the instance of a claimant in a proceeding under Section 16 of the Railway Claims Tribunal Act, 1987, and is directed against an award dated 29th April, 2008, passed by the Railway Claims Tribunal, Kolkata Bench, thereby dismissing the said application on the ground that the claimant failed to prove the bona fide as well as accidental fall and the resultant death of also failed to produce any eyewitness to prove the accidental fall causing death of her husband. Being dissatisfied, the claimant has come up with the present first appeal.

(2) The appellant before us lodged a claim under Section 16 of the Railway Claims Tribunal Act, 1987 thereby praying for compensation of Rs.4 lakh for the death of her husband on the allegation that on 4th March, 2005 while he was travelling from Sainthia to Bolpur by Down Ganodevta Express with a valid second class ticket, he accidentally fell down from the running train between Sainthia and Bataspur and consequently, died. The application was opposed by the railway authority by filing written statement and its defence may be summed up thus: a) The claim-application was not maintainable












Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top