SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2009 Supreme(Cal) 205

PARTHA SAKHA DATTA
Sandip Saha – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF WEST BENGAL – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appearing Parties: Himangshu Decided on :, Suman Decided on :, Joymalya Bagchi, Deep Chain Kabir, Advocates.

Judgment :-

P.S. DATTA, J.

(1) By this application dated 27th February 2008 u/s 407 read with section 482 Cr.p.c. prayer has been made by the defacto complainant for transfer of the Sessions Case No. 16(6)/07 u/s 498A/306/34 IPC form the court of the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court at Bishnupur to any court of the Sessions Division of Paschim Medinipur.

(2) The father of the defacto complainant who is also the father of the victim made a representation before the Superintendent of Police alleging that the accused persons have been constantly threatening them but the police was also not arresting the accused persons except one. On 8th May 2007 the decacto complainant lodged a general diary being GDE No. 771 dated 8.5.2007 with the Inspector in charge, Paschim Medinupur. The defacto complainant and the members of his family are required to attend before the learned Trial Court at Bishnupur but their lives are in danger as they were constantly threatened by the accused persons. One of the accused is also a police constable of Bishnupur. Accordingly, prayer is made for transfer of the case from Bishnupur to Paschim Medinupur.

(3) Mr. Dey, learned Senior Advocate appe




Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top