BHASKAR BHATTACHARYA, PRASENJIT MANDAL
Pratima Paul – Appellant
Versus
Rupa Paul – Respondent
BHASKAR BHATTACHARYA, ACJ.
(1.) This first appeal is at the instance of the substituted plaintiffs in a suit for declaration and injunction and is directed against a judgment and decree dated 14th September, 2001, passed by the learned Judge, Second Bench of the City Civil Court at Calcutta, in Title Suit No. 936 of 1987, thereby dismissing the said suit.
(2.) Being dissatisfied, the substituted plaintiffs have come up with the present first appeal.
(3.) The original plaintiff, the second son of the original defendant, filed in the City Civil Court at Calcutta a suit being Tide Suit No.936 of 1987 thereby praying for the following relief: "a) Decree for declaration that the Decree dated 17.3.87 passed by learned Judge, Second Bench, Small Causes Court, Calcutta in Suit No.2757/86 is void, inoperative and not binding on the plaintiff; b) Decree for declaration that the plaintiff has right, title interest in the suit property by the law of inheritance as son/heir of his deceased father; c) Decree for declaration that the Deed of Settlement registered at Registrar of Assurance and entered into Book No.1 Volume No. 154, Page No. 166 to 177 being No.3802 the year 1971 is void
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.