BHASKAR BHATTACHARYA, PARTHA SAKHA DATTA
Kuntal Kundu – Appellant
Versus
National Insurance Company Limited – Respondent
BHASKAR BHATTACHARYA, J.
(1) THIS appeal is at the instance of a claimant and is directed against the award dated 25th August, 2004 passed by the Motor Accident Claim Tribunal, third Court, Howrah in M. A. C. C. No. 390 of 2002 thereby disposing of an application under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act by directing the insurance Company to pay a sum of Rs.3,25,000/- as compensation which is inclusive of Rs. 25,000/- already received by him in a proceeding under Section 140 of the Act.
(2) BEING dissatisfied, the claimant has come up with the present appeal. Mr Banik, the learned advocate appearing on behalf of the appellant, contends before us that although it has been well established from the materials on record that in view of rash and negligent manner of driving of the offending vehicle, his client was injured and that the extent of permanent disablement has been found to be seventy percent and at the same time, the Tribunal having found that the yearly income of the appellant was Rs.56,875/- as per income tax return being Exbt.-5 and that he was aged 34 years at the time of accident, the tribunal below erred in law in assessing the
Helen C. Rebello v. Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.