SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2008 Supreme(Cal) 760

INDIRA BANERJEE
Bathgate and Company – Appellant
Versus
Reverend Hanok Ghose – Respondent


Judgment :-

(1.) IN this application, the petitioners have sought orders for discharge of the respondent No. 1 as Administrator-De-Bonis-Non of the estate of Late Gertrude violet Chippendale, hereinafter referred to as the Testatrix, cancellation of a sale deed dated 14th August, 2006 executed by the respondent No. 1, in respect of premises No. 62/11, Ballygunge Circular Road, calcutta-700 019, hereinafter referred to as the said premises, and other consequential reliefs.

(2.) THE petitioner No. 1, a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956 and the petitioner No. 2, a school run by one Smt. Shalini Hingorani, are tenants at the said premises. The petitioner Nos. 1 and 2 claim to have been paying rent to the credit of the respondent No. 1. The petitioner No. 3, an indigenous church is an occupant of a portion of the said premises and has filed a suit for declaration of its right of adverse possession of the area occupied by it.

(3.) AT all material times, Premises No. 62 /11, Ballygunge Circular Road, calcutta-700 019 was owned by the testatrix, who died on 7th May, 1969. The respondent Nos. 8 to 19 are all beneficiaries of the Will executed by the Testatrix on 7th Septemb



































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top