KALYAN JYOTI SENGUPTA AND PRASENJIT MANDAL, J.

(1) THIS application is against an order passed in exercise of the contempt jurisdiction by the learned Central Administrative Tribunal in c. P. C. 10 of 2006 in connection with O. A. 652/2004. Mr. Das, learned senior counsel for the respondents has not questioned the maintainability of the application, therefore, we make it clear that without going into the question of maintainability we shall examine the matter on merit. The fact of the case is as follows:

(2) THE respondents herein made an application, being O. A. 652/2004, before the learned Tribunal praying for grant of temporary status by regularization as if they were working as Casual Production Assistants in the doordarshan Kendra, Kolkata. The said application was heard extensively and upon hearing, learned Tribunal disposed of the same by passing an order dated November 16, 2005. The relevant ordering portion of the said order is quoted hereunder:

"8. In order to do justice to the applicants we feel ends of justice would be met if following directions are given to the respondents: it there are 14 vacancies of Production assistants with the respondents they shall,