MANIK MOHAN SARKAR
Bikash Sharma – Appellant
Versus
Sudama Majhi – Respondent
(1.) THIS is an application under Article 227 of the Constitution of India preferred against Order No. 9 dated July 24, 2006 passed by Mr. S.A. Ansari, learned Single Judge (Junior Division) at jalpaiguri in Title Suit No. 148/2006.
(2.) BRIEFLY, petitioners case is that he brought Title Suit No. 148 of 2006 against opposite party Nos. 2 and 3 as defendant Nos. 1 and 2 and opposite party Nos. 4 to 12 as proforma defendant Nos. 3 to 11, for declaration of tile, perpetual injunction and consequential reliefs. On June 20,2006, the petitioner jointly with opposite party Nos. 2 and 3 (proforma defendants there) filed an application for compromise of the suit under Order 23 Rule 3 of the Code of civil Procedure for passing a compromise decree. On the same day, the petitioner also filed another application under order 6 Rule 17 of the Code of civil Procedure for amendment of the plaint and on the other hand, the proforma defendant Nos. 3 to 12 also filed another application under Order 1 rule 10 (2) of the Code of Civil Procedure for their transposition to the category of co-plaintiffs. Subsequently, on July 14, 2006, the present opposite party no. 1, Shri Sudama Majhi filed an
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.