NADIRA PATHERYA
Hindustan Motors Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Ld. Fifth Industrial Tribunal – Respondent
(1) THIS is an application for setting aside the orders dated March 11, 2007, April 13, 2007 and August 1, 2007, passed by the Tribunal.
(2) THE case of the petitioner is that an application was filed under section 33 (2) (b) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. An Advocate was engaged for pursuing the said matter. Direction was also given for filing written statement by the workman. Such written statement, though filed, was not served on the petitioner-company and for nonappearance of the petitioner-company and/or its Advocate engaged, the matter, by order dated March 11, 2007, was fixed for ex parte hearing. On April 13, 2007, as none appeared on behalf of the company, the application was dismissed for non-prosecution. On April 25, 2007, at a meeting with the union, the petitioner came to know of the order of dismissal dated April 13, 2007. Thereafter, enquiry was made from its Advocate and the petitioner was informed that no step had been taken by its Advocate to appear before the Tribunal because of ill health and, therefore, the matter was fixed for ex parte hearing and dismissed on April 13, 2007: An application was thereafter filed for recalling the order dated Ap
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.