SURINDER SINGH, TAPEN SEN
Steel Authority of India Ltd – Appellant
Versus
Nitish Chakraborty – Respondent
(1.) THIS appeal is directed against a Judgment dated 4. 7. 2001 passed by a learned single Judge of this Court in W. P. No. 7353 (W)of 1999 whereby and where under he was pleased to set aside the Order of removal dated 20. 5. 1998 as well as the Order of the Appellate Authority dated 15/19. 2. 1999 and was further pleased to substitute the order of punishment of removal by a minor penalty of censure. While allowing the Writ Petition, the learned Judge also directed reinstatement of the petitioner with further directions that the management/respondent/ appellant herein shall extend all service benefits to the Petitioner including backwages within a period of four weeks from the date of communication of the Order.
(2.) THE short facts which could be gathered from a perusal of the Writ petition which was registered as W. P. No. 7353 (W) of 1999 are that on 23. 8. 1997 the Petitioner was placed under suspension for certain allegations amounting to serious misconduct under the Certified standing Orders of the Company and on 25. 8. 1997 the Deputy General manager, (CO and CCO) Steel Authority of India Ltd. , Durgapur Steel Plant issued the Charge-sheet. From the Statement of
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.