1980 Supreme(Cal) 284
CALCUTTA HIGH COURT
P. C. BOROOAH, R. K. SHARMA, JJ.
SUNDARI DEVI SHAW
VERSUS
STATE OF WEST BENGAL
Criminal Revn. No. 947 of 1980,
Decided On : 24 -7 -1980
The Collector's power to confiscate vehicles under Section 6A of the Essential Commodities Act was not taken away by the Repealing and Amending Act, 1978.
Headnote:
ESSENTIAL COMMODITIES ACT - CONFISCATION OF VEHICLES - SECTION 6A - AMENDMENTS AND REPEALS - SCOPE AND EFFECT - ESSENTIAL COMMODITIES (AMENDMENT) ACT, 1974 (ACT 30 OF 1974) - ESSENTIAL COMMODITIES (AMENDMENT) ACT, 1976 (ACT 92 OF 1976) - REPEALING AND AMENDING ACT, 1978 (ACT 38 OF 1978) - INTERPRETATION.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner's two tanker lorries were seized for carrying High Speed Diesel Oil without a valid permit. The Collector ordered the confiscation of the lorries unless the petitioner paid a fine equivalent to the market price of the seized diesel. The petitioner challenged the Collector's order, arguing that the power to confiscate vehicles was taken away by the Repealing and Amending Act, 1978.
Finding of the Court:
The court held that the Collector's power to confiscate vehicles was not taken away by the Repealing and Amending Act, 1978. The court found that Section 4 of the Essential Commodities (Amendment) Act, 1974, which gave the Collector this power, was repealed by the Repealing and Amending Act, 1978, but that Section 6A of the principal Act, which was amended by the Essential Commodities (Amendment) Act, 1976, to give the Collector the option to impose a fine instead of confiscating a vehicle, was not repealed.
Issues: Whether the Collector's power to confiscate vehicles was taken away by the Repealing and Amending Act, 1978.
Ratio Decidendi: The court found that the Collector's power to confiscate vehicles was not taken away by the Repealing and Amending Act, 1978, because Section 6A of the principal Act, which was amended by the Essential Commodities (Amendment) Act, 1976, to give the Collector the option to impose a fine instead of confiscating a vehicle, was not repealed.
Final Decision: The court set aside the Collector's order of confiscation and sent the matter back to him for reconsideration.
P. C. Borooah, J. :- On March 31, 1980 an Inspector of Police attached to the Enforcement Branch conducted a raid on premises No. 2-1B, Chetla Road, Calcutta and seized, inter alia, High Speeds Diesel Oil, Lubricating Oil and two tanker lorries, bearing Nos. WBQ 4968 and WMK 2403 with 10,000 litres and 12,000 litres of High Speed Diesel in their respective tanks. Pursuant to such seizure, Section V-2, Case No. 88 dated March 31, 1980 under Section 7 (1) (a) (ii) of the Essential Commodities Act, 1955 (hereinafter the Act) was started.
2. The two tanker lorries were registered in the name of one Satya Narayan Shaw and since he was dead, his wife and legal heir Smt. Sundari Devi Shaw, applied to the Collector, 24 Parganas to whom the seizure had been reported for the return of the said lorries. The Collector by an order dated June 6, 1980 passed in Misc. Case No. 41 of 1980 gave the petitioner the option of paying within forty five days of the order a fine totalling the market price of 22,000 litres of High Speed Diesel Oil seized in the two tankers, failing which the tankers were directed to be confiscated to the State. Against this order the present application has been filed by the petitioner with notice to the State.
3. Mr. Asoke Kumar Sen appearing with Mr. Balai Chandra Ray for the petitioner has submitted that the power of confiscation in regard to a vehicle or other conveyance used in carrying any essential commodity which had been seized in pursuance of an order made under Section 3 of the Act, was given to a Collector for the first time by Section 4 of the 1974 Amendment of the Act. The Repealing and Amending Act, 1978, which received the assent of the President on November 26, 1978, repealed Sections 2 to 12 and 14 of the Amending Act of 1974. As the tanker lorries were seized after this Act came into force, the Collector could not have taken recourse to Section 6 of the General Clauses Act to justify his order of confiscation.
4. Mr. Sen further argued that movement of goods by road transport has increased considerably in recent years and in order to protect carriers, whose vehicles may be involved in offences under the Act without their knowledge or consent, Parliament took away the Collector"s power of confiscation of vehicles by repealing Section 4 of the Amending Act of 1974.
5. Mr. Birendra Nath Mitra, the Public Prosecutor of this Court, has referred us to the 1976 Amendment of the Act, Section 4 of which re-numbered Section 6A of the principal Act as sub-section (1) thereof and a second proviso was added, and this proviso gave an option to the owner of a seized vehicle to pay a fine in lieu of confiscation. Mr. Mitra argued that when Section 4 of the 1976 Amendment Act came into force, Section 4 of the earlier Amendment Act of 1974 became unnecessary, and therefore Parliament included the redundant sections of the 1974 Amending Act in the Repealing and Amending Act, 1978. As such, according to Mr. Mitra, S. 6A (1) and the second proviso which was added to the principal Act by the 1976 Amendment cannot be deemed to have been affected.
6. Till June 22, 1974 a Collector did not hare the power to confiscate, inter alia, any vehicle or conveyance used in carrying an essential commodity which had been seized pursuant to an order made under Section 3 of the Act. Section 4 of the Essential Commodities (Amendment) Act, 1974 (Act 30 of 1974) for the first time gave the Collector such a power. This Act was further amended by the Essential Commodities (Amendment) Act, 1976 (Act 92 of 1976). Section 4 of this Act divided Section 6A of the principal Act in to sub-s. (1) and (2) and apart from some changes introduced in sub-section (1) a second proviso was added thereto which reads as follows :-
"Provided further that in the case of any animal, vehicle, vessel or other conveyance used for the carriage of goods or passengers for hire, the owner of such animal, vehicle, vessel or other conveyance shall be given an option t