SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1982 Supreme(Cal) 359

B.C.CHAKRABARTI, N.G.CHAUDHURI
MANGAL CHOUHAN – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent


JUDGEMENT

N. G. Chaudhuri, J. :- In this petition under S.401 read with S.482 Criminal P. C., the petitioner, who describes himself as a carrying contractor, prays for quashing the F.I.R. in N.P.P.S. Case No. 18 dated 24-4-82 and investigation staffed by the Police on the basis of the said F.I.R. Without issuing any Rule, treating the petition as a contested application, we ordered stay of investigation till disposal of the petition on 6-7-82.

2. N.P.P.S. Case No. 18 dated 24-4-82 mentioned above is epilogue to S.P.P.S. Case No. 89 dated 13-4-82. The subject matter of both the cases is huge quantity of R.B.D. palm oil which is sold exclusively through public distribution system, that is to say through Ration Shops. For proper appreciation of the contentions raked it is necessary to narrate the facts in some details.

3. Promode Gupta, a partner of M/s. Bulichand Oil Mills informed O.C. Budge Budge P.S. by a letter dated 7-4-82 that their firm worked as tinning agents of S.T.C. of India Ltd. and in that capacity through their transport contractors, named in the letter, they made arrangements for lifting from Budge Budge installation 10.840 M.T. R.B.D. Palm oil in lorry tanker No. 4070











Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top