SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1986 Supreme(Cal) 268

SUDHANSHU SEKHAR GANGULY
MRITYUNJOY DAS – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent


JUDGEMENT

1. It appears that T.S.No. 42 of 1975 of the Munsif's Court at Nabadwip, District Nadia was instituted by Narayan Gopal Dey and eight others against Radha Ballabh Ghosh for recovery of a shop-room situated at holding No. 87B/1 on the Bazar Road within Nabadwip Municipality and tenanted by the said Radha Ballabh. It appears that both the petitioners acquired 1/9th share of the land and structure covered by plot No. 1282/ 9519 holding No. 88B/1 Bazar Road by 9519; purchase from the heirs of Kartick Chandra, one of landlord-plaintiffs and the tenant attorned in their favour. They both applied for being added as parties to the aforementioned T.S.No.42 of 1975 and petitioner No.1 Mrityunjoy was added as a pro forma defendant to the said suit whereas the petitioner of Dhananjoy went on pending.

2. T.S. No. 42 of 1975 was decreed on compromise in terms of a solemnama filed by the plaintiffs and the defendant Radha Ballav (Annexure-C ) against the said defendant and the suit was directed to continue against the added pro forma defendant Mrityunjoy. The decree-holders put the decree to execution which was numbered as T. Ex. Case No. 18 of 1977. The petitioner No. 1 filed an applicat







Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top