SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1991 Supreme(Cal) 23

MD. MURTAZA – Appellant
Versus
KAUSAR PARVIN – Respondent


JUDGEMENT

The petitioner has by this revisional application challenged the maintainability of a proceeding u/s. 125(1) of the Code of Criminal Procedure for short Code, read with S. 3 of the Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Divorce) Act 1986, hereinafter referred to as Act of 1986.

2. The Opp. Party filed the petition u/s. 125(1) of the Code read with S.3 of the Act of 1986 before the Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Chandanagar which was registered as Misc. Case No. 191 of 1989. She inter alia stated in that petition that she is the mother of Sanjiba and Sitara, 2 minor daughters aged about 4½ and 2½ years respectively and the O.P. is the father of the said minors. On 27-12-87 the husband of the petitioner and father of the said minor had divorced her and since then the said minors are residing under the care and custody of the petitioner at village Teelinepara, P.S. Bhadreswar. The O.P./father since the date of divorce has not paid a single paisa towards the maintenance of the minor children though he is legally and morally bound to do so as the minor children are unable to maintain themselves. In order to avoid future anomalies, the O.P./father agreed to pay monthly mainte






Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top