SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2012 Supreme(Cal) 748

High Court of Judicature at Calcutta
RAGHUNATH BHATTACHARYA, J.
Niloy Modak
Versus
The State of West Bengal
C.R.A. No. 426 of 2009
Decided on : 13-08-2012

Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant:Milan Mukherjee, aibal Mondal, Advocates.
For the Respondent:Amartya Ghosh, Advocate.

The burden of proof lies on the prosecution to prove the guilt of the accused beyond a reasonable doubt. In the absence of sufficient evidence to prove the essential ingredients of the offense, the accused is entitled to an acquittal.

Headnote:

KIDNAPPING - Section 363 IPC - Age of Victim - Love Affair - Consent - Identification of Accused - False Statement under Section 313 CrPC - Burden of Proof.

Fact of the Case:

The appellant, Niloy Modak, was convicted by the trial court for kidnapping a minor girl, Mampi Shikari, under Section 363 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC). The prosecution alleged that Niloy, along with two other accused, Apurba Biswas and Rebati Modak, induced Mampi to go to a red light area in Kalna with the intention of exploiting her. Mampi was rescued by members of the Durbar Mohila Samanwaya Committee, a local NGO. The trial court convicted Niloy but acquitted Apurba and Rebati.

Finding of the Court:

The High Court found that the prosecution failed to prove the essential ingredients of the offense under Section 363 IPC. The court noted that Mampi was nearly 18 years old at the time of the incident and had a love affair with Niloy. She left her house with Niloy voluntarily and was not kidnapped. The court also found that the witnesses, including the pimp of the red light area and the members of the Durbar Mohila Samanwaya Committee, failed to identify Niloy as one of the accused.

Issues: 1. Whether the prosecution proved that Mampi was a minor on the date of the incident? 2. Whether there was any inducement or compulsion on the part of Niloy to take Mampi away from her lawful guardian? 3. Whether the witnesses were able to identify Niloy as one of the accused?

Ratio Decidendi: 1. The court held that Mampi was nearly 18 years old at the time of the incident and was close to the age of majority. Therefore, she was not a minor within the meaning of Section 363 IPC. 2. The court found that there was no inducement or compulsion on the part of Niloy to take Mampi away from her lawful guardian. Mampi left her house with Niloy voluntarily and out of her own accord. 3. The court held that the witnesses, including the pimp of the red light area and the members of the Durbar Mohila Samanwaya Committee, failed to identify Niloy as one of the accused. Therefore, the prosecution failed to prove that Niloy was involved in the kidnapping.

Final Decision: The High Court set aside the conviction of Niloy Modak and acquitted him of the charges under Section 363 IPC.

Judgment

Raghunath Bhattacharya, J.

1. This appeal is directed against the judgment and order of conviction passed by Sri Bibek Chaudhuri, Additional District and Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court, Kalna, thereby convicting the appellant Niloy Modak for commission of the offence under Section 363 I.P.C. and sentencing him to suffer R.I. for five years and also to pay fine of Rs. 1,000/-I.D. to undergo S.I. for three months. Rest of the accused namely Apurba Biswas and Rebati Modak are acquitted from the charge under Section 363/366 I.P.C.

2. A thumbnail sketch of the prosecution case in brief is that Mampi Shikari a resident of Samudragarh, a teenaged girl lodged a written complaint to the local P.S. stating inter alia that on 21.09.2006 Niloy Modak accused cum covillager induced her and pretended that he used to love her. On 21.09.2006 in the noon Niloy took her to the Red Light area of Kadamtala at Kalna for some immoral purpose. Defacto complainant Mampi Shikari understood his illegal motive and purpose. Local resident and the member of the Durbar Mohila Samanwaya Committee saved her from the hand of Niloy Modak. Niloy Modak fled away. The member of the Durbar Mohila Samanwaya Committee brought her to Kalna P.S. and she lodged the complaint. Hence the prosecution case. The defence case as it appears from the trend of the cross-examination of the prosecution witnesses and answer given by Niloy Modak to his examination under Section 313 Cr.P.C. is that of absolute innocence.

3. On perusal of the C.D. and after hearing both side the learned Court framed charge against Niloy Modak, Rebati Modak and Apurba Biswas under Section 363/366 I.P.C. whereby each of them pleaded not guilty and claimed to be tried. In the instant case from the side of the prosecution as many as ten witnesses were examined whereas no witness was forthcoming from the side of the defence.

4. In order to bring home the charge leveled against the accused person from the side of the prosecution i.e. the State of West Bengal as many as ten witnesses were examined. The defacto complainant cum the victim girl Mampi Shikari was examined as P.W. 1. Joyotsna Sarkar is a resident of Kadamtala was examined as P.W. 2. Lata Dutta, a member of Durbar Mohila Samanwaya Committee was examined as P.W. 3. Uttara Shikari, mother of Mampi Shikari and Arun Shikari the father of Mampi Shikari were examined as P.W. 4 and P.W. 6 respectively whereas one Sandhya Das, another employee of Durbar Mohila Samanwaya Committee was examined as P.W. 5. P.W. 7 Biju Sikari and P.W. 8 Girish Sikari are the near relation of Mampi Sikari as examined as P.W. 7 and P.W. 8 respectively. Dipika Mukherjee, an N.G.O. and resident of Kalna examined as P.W. 9 whereas I.O. of this case Gopinath Chatterjee was posted at Kalna P.S. as S.I. of Police as examined as P.W. 10. On the basis of their oral testimony learned Court after hearing both side convicted the accused Niloy Modak and acquitted Rebati Modak and Apurba Biswas against the charge leveled against them.

5. Mampi Sikari (P.W. 1) contended that on the date of occurrence in the noon time she left the house and go to local B.D.O. office to correct the ration card of his brother. On the way to the B.D.O. office she met with Apurba Biswas and according to Mampi Apurba Biswas told her that Nilay want to meet her. It is a clear admission of Mampi that she had love affairs with Niloy as there is love affair between them Mampi went away with Niloy and Niloy took her to Kalna and reached a place where Mampi found that it was a Red Light area. According to Mampi some local inhabitants of that area asked her about the visit and she told to one Joyotsna (Masi) that she never came to the place and it is unknown to her. Thereafter some lady brought to her to the Kalna P.S. and she lodged a complain to Kalna P.S. It is in the evidence that Niloy Modak, Apurba Biswas and Rebati Modak brought Mampi to Kalna Red Light area on the fateful day and where she was interrog












Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top