SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2012 Supreme(Cal) 851

RAGHUNATH BHATTACHARYA
Ayub Ansari – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF WEST BENGAL – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant:Ms. Sujata Das, Advocate.
For the Respondent:Sunirmal Nag, Advocate.

Judgment

Raghunath Bhattacharya, J.

1. This appeal is directed against the order of conviction passed by Sri D. Pal, Additional Sessions Judge, Fast Track, 4th Court, Malda in Sessions Case No. 157 of 2005 thereby furnishing the accused Ayub Ansari under Section 376 I.P.C. and sentencing to suffer R.I. for seven years and to pay fine of Rs. 3,000/-I.D. to S.I for six months.

2. Shortly put the petitioner’s case is that in the evening of 09.04.2004 when Munni Khatun, daughter of the defacto complainant aged about 15 years was in the house. Accused Ayub Ansari came there and informed Munni that her father was calling. Accused then took her to a ‘Shashan’ near Dakbungalow and the point of dragger committed rape upon her. The defacto complainant, father of Munni made a search for her and at about 11 P.M. in the night on reaching this spot he found that his daughter is lying in the verandah of the temple of the ‘shashan’ and was feeling ill. Munni narrated everything to his father and thereafter a petition of complaint was lodged to the respective P.S.

3. The defence case as it appears from the trend of the cross-examination of the prosecution witnesses, the evidence of the defence witn







Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top