Harish Tandon, J.

These two revisional applications have been preferred against the self same order and as such are taken up together to avoid prolixity of repetition.

2. The petitioner, being the plaintiff, has challenged the judgment and order dated 11th September, 2012 passed in Misc.Appeal No.09 of 2012 by the District Judge, Andaman and Nicobar Islands by which an application for injunction is rejected.

3. Shorn of unnecessary details, the petitioner filed Other Suit No.63 of 2012 against the opposite parties seeking for a decree for specific performance of an agreement for sale of immovable property with an alternate prayer to refund the money paid as and by way of earnest money together with interest at the rate of 18 per centum.

4. The opposite parties are the directors of the M/s Andaman and Nicobar Fish Processing Project (P) Limited and were carrying out the business activities from survey No.96/3, measuring an area of 1.7970 hectares of land situated at Dhanikhari village under Ferrargunj Tehsil, South Andaman District. For running the said business, the opposite parties approached the Bank for the loan, but, because of the loss suffered by them, they could not