RUMA PAL
HIMALAYA RUBBER PRODUCTS LIMITED – Appellant
Versus
BOARD FOR INDUSTRIAL AND FINANCIAL RECONSTRUCTION – Respondent
SMT. RUMA PAL, J. - The petitioner No. 1 is a registered dealer under the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 (hereinafter referred to as "the 1956 Act") and under the Bengal Finance (Sales Tax) Act, 1941 (hereinafter referred to as "the 1941 Act").
The grievance of the petitioners is that the sales tax authorities are refusing to issue declaration forms either under the 1956 Act or under the 1941 Act. It is stated that the ground for such refusal is the petitioners' failure to pay the arrear of sales tax dues. The petitioner No. 1 is, it is contended, being deprived thereby of the concessional rates of tax available to registered dealers in contravention of section 22(1) of the Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985.
The petitioner No. 1 is admittedly liable to pay sales tax both under the 1956 Act and under the 1941 Act. In this case we are only concerned with the refusal of the sales tax authority to give declaration forms under rule 4 of the Central Sales Tax (West Bengal) Rules, 1958, to the petitioner No. 1. Inasmuch as the questions to be decided in this matter ultimately involve only a question of interpretation of statutory provisions the matter is being
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.