SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1959 Supreme(Cal) 160

S.N.GUHA RAY
Jahar Lal Chandra – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF WEST BENGAL – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
A.K. Dutt and Dilip Kumar Dutt, for Petitioners; J.M. Banerjee and Benoy Chandra Sen, for Opposite Parties.

ORDER :-

This petition by Jahar Lal Chandra, Benoy Kumar Chandra and Benoy. Kumar Chandra who were summoned under Sec. 342 and 384 of the Indian Penal Code by the Magistrate on the orders of the Sessions Judge for further enquiry under S. 436 of the Cr. P.C. is directed against the order of the learned Sessions Judge and also the order passed by the learned Magistrate on the basis of the order of the learned Sessions Judge. The facts briefly are that Rabindra, the opposite party No. 2 filed before the Magistrate at Sealdah on 30-10-1958, a complaint against four persons, the present three petitioners and another Jagadanonda Chandra alleging that he was the Cashier of the firm of Messrs. P.C. Chandra of which the three petitioners and their brother, Jagadananda were the proprietors and that as such on 17-07-1958 he as usual at the end of the day's work made over the entire cash balance including a sum of Rs. 3,000/- to Jahar Lal at about 9-30 or 10 P.M. that on the 20th July at about 10-30 or 11. A.M. Rabindra was sent for from his residence by the proprietors through two of their durwans and that when he went to their residence at P-24, C.I.T. Road, Entally, he was taken to the fir










Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top