SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1950 Supreme(Cal) 156

SINHA
KHUDI PROSAD BHAKAT – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF WEST BENGAL – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Pritibhusan Barman, Ajit Kumar Dutt, Chandra Sekhar Sen, Smriti Kumar Rai Chaudhary

JUDGEMENT

Sinha, J.

[1] This is an application on behalf of one Khudi Prosad Bhakat alias Teli, under Article 226 of the Constitution, for the issue of a writ in the nature of mandamus or certiorari upon the District Magistrate of Birbhum directing him to withdraw the order of externment dated 22-5-1950, passed on the applicant and for such other order as to the Court seem fit and proper. On this application, a Rule was issued on the District Magistrate to show-cause why such a writ should not be issued upon him and why such further or other order should not be made as the Court thinks fit and proper.

[2] Before I deal with the merits of the application I must refer to the procedure adopted by the respondents for showing cause. What has been done is that the District Magistrate Birbhum has addressed a letter to the Assistant Registrar of the High Court in its Appellate Side, in which he has stated certain facts and has further asked that the order of externment being of administrative importance, the Legal Remembrancer should be requested to have the State represented in the proceedings on the relevant date fixed for the hearing of the Rule. All have before me is this letter, which do












Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top