SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2012 Supreme(Cal) 354

PRASENJIT MANDAL
Mokibul @ Mokibur – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF WEST BENGAL – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Achin Jana, Suman Chakravarthy

Judgment

Prasenjit Mandal, J.

1. CHALLENGE is to the Order dated December 24, 2009 passed by the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Uluberia, Howrah in Misc. Case No.99 of 2005 thereby allowing an application under Section 125 of the Criminal Procedure Code (in short, 'Cr. P.C.').

2. THE short fact is that the petitioner and the opposite party No.2 were married on November 28, 2003 according to Muslim Rites and Customs without consent of his parents and after marriage the husband was living with the wife at the house of the father of the wife. One child was born in the wedlock. THE members of the family of the husband took the husband/petitioner herein to their house on assurance that the wife would be taken to their house soon. Accordingly, the wife requested the husband to take her to their house. THE parents of the opposite party demanded Rs.25,000/- and other articles as dowry. THE father of the petitioner is poor and he was unable to pay the said dowry. THE husband did not keep any information about the petitioner and the child. THE petitioner has no income. On the other hand, the opposite party earns Rs.6,000/- per month by working as a Jori worker and he has also in







Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top