SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2012 Supreme(Cal) 63

HARISH TANDAN
Sukhadabala Saha – Appellant
Versus
Naren Saha – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Debjit Mukherjee, Swarup Karmakar, Sushmita Chatterjee, Haradhan Banerji

JUDGMENT

HARISH TANDON, J.

1. THIS revisional application is directed against an Order No. 16 dated 22nd July, 2011 passed by the learned Additional District Judge, 2nd Court at Howrah in Title Appeal No. 127 of 2009 by which an application for amendment of the written statement at the appellate stage is rejected. The opposite party instituted a suit for eviction under the West Bengal Premises Tenancy Act, 1997.

2. IN the written statement a plea was taken by the petitioner relating to the derivative title of the opposite party and also non-joinder of the necessary party. According to the opposite party, upon the death of the original tenant some of the heirs and legal representatives of the deceased tenant are not made party to the suit. It appears that a specific issue in this regard was framed by the trial court and on consideration of the said issue on merit it was answered against the petitioner. Even the objection as to the Title of the opposite party, was also considered by the trial court and negated on merit.

By filing the proposed amendment, the petitioner intends to incorporate the factum of non-joinder of necessary party as well as challenging the derivative Title of the




Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top