SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2012 Supreme(Cal) 596

PRASENJIT MANDAL
Samir Mitra – Appellant
Versus
Tapati Banerjee – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Prabal Mukherjee, A.K.Bhattacharya, P.S.Basu, S.Talukdar

JUDGMENT:

PRASENJIT MANDAL, J.

1. THIS application is at the instance of a third party and is directed against the Order dated August 6, 2011 passed by the learned Civil Judge (Junior Division), 1st Court, Alipore in Misc. Case No.73 of 2008 arising out of Title Execution Case No.24 of 2004.

2. THE said misc. case was filed under Order 21 Rules 97, 98, 99, 100, 101 and 103 of the C.P.C. after disposal of the Title Execution Case No.24 of 2004 and that application was converted into the Misc. Case No.73 of 2008. The petitioners also filed an application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act for condonation of delay in filing the said misc. case. The decree-holder instituted the aforesaid execution proceeding for taking possession of a premises according to the award passed by the learned Arbitrator in Dispute Case No.10/RCS of 1994-95. The petitioners have contended that they were not aware of any arbitration proceeding or the institution of the execution proceeding. He is an N.R.I. and as such, he had knowledge of such matters and he had been dispossessed from the Garage No.4 without his knowledge. So, he filed the said application for getting possession of the said garage and other







Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top