SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2012 Supreme(Cal) 175

SOUMITRA PAL
Sourendranath Maity – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF WEST BENGAL – Respondent


Judgment

1. IN this writ petition, the petitioner, who was a member of the West Bengal Higher Judicial Service and was appointed Chairman of the Municipal Building Tribunal, Kolkata Municipal Corporation, by notification dated 25th November, 2002 for a period of two years with effect from 1st November, 2002 to 31st October, 2004, has challenged the notification dated 27th June, 2003, issued under sub-section (6) of section 415 of the Kolkata Municipal Corporation Act, 1980, whereby his services were withdrawn with effect from 30th June, 2003 until further orders.

2. THE impugned notification has been challenged on the ground that as under sub-section (6) of section 415 of the Act, Chairman or a member appointed under the said section cannot be removed except for incompetence, misconduct or any other good or sufficient reason and as in the instant case neither reason was assigned nor any enquiry was made, the impugned notification dated 27th June, 2003 is illegal. None appears on behalf of the petitioner when the matter is taken up for hearing. 2

3. IN order to adjudicate the dispute it is necessary to refer to section 415(6) of the Act which is as under:-

"415. Municipal Building Tr




Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top