SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2011 Supreme(Cal) 1478

J.K.BISWAS
Manoj Kumar Mukherjee – Appellant
Versus
Icici Bank Limited – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Rasomoy Mondal, Mrinmayee Sahu, Amitava Das, Amitava Mitra

JUDGMENT:

1. THE petitioner in this WP under Article 226 dated November 16, 2011 is seeking the following principal relief:

"a) A Writ of or in the nature of Mandamus do issue commanding the respondent authorities to send the dispute between petitioner and ICICI Bank Limited Respondent No. 1 to the Learned Lok Adalat at the Hon'ble High Court at Calcutta forthwith."

2. THE petitioner took a home loan from ICICI Bank Limited, a private bank and as such not amenable to the writ jurisdiction of the High Court. Since he was in default on the loan, proceedings have been initiated under the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002. THE authorised officer took measures under section 13(4) of the Act issuing a possession notice dated August 2011.

3. STATING his "financial hardships" the petitioner sent a lawyer's notice seeking time to repay the loan. Now he has filed this WP alleging that his case has not been considered fairly and reasonably, and asserting that this Court has jurisdiction to transfer the case to the Lok Adalat, organised for the High Court at Calcutta, for amicable settlement under section 20 of the Legal Services






















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top