SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2011 Supreme(Cal) 163

TAPEN SEN
Tirupati Jute Industries Limited – Appellant
Versus
Employees Provident Fund Organisation – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Partha Bhanja Chowdhury, S.K. Singh, Sujit Sharma, P.K. Mallick, Anil Kumar Gupta

JUDGMENT

TAPEN SEN, J.

1. In this writ petition, the petitioners, Tirupati Jute Industries Ltd. and its Director, have prayed for an Order commanding upon the respondents to withdraw and/or cancel and quash the Order dated February 16, 2009 as contained in Annexure-P/8 to the writ petition purporting to be an Order passed under Section 7-A of the Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 (hereinafter referred to as the said Act). The petitioners have also prayed for quashing the Order dated February 26, 2010 as contained in Annexure- P/10 passed under the provisions of Section 7-B of the said Act refusing to review the Order dated February 16, 2009. The petitioners have also prayed for setting aside the Order/Communication dated July 23, 2010 as contained in Annexure- P/11 whereby and whereunder the Senior Manager (Operations) of United Bank of India informed the Petitioners that their account has been attached y the Employees' Provident Fund Organisation and that they have been Ordered by the Employees' Provident Fund authorities to pay the available balance which was lying in their account and for which the amount of Rs. 1,81,128.18 paise had already been de
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top