SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2011 Supreme(Cal) 59

PRASENJIT MANDAL
Archana Das – Appellant
Versus
Subrata Das – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Sabyasachi Bhattacharya, Sohini Bhattacharyya

JUDGMENT

PRASENJIT MANDAL, J.

1. THIS application is at the instance of the wife/respondent and is directed against the order no.47 dated July 28, 2009 passed by the learned Additional District Judge, Fifth Fast Track Court, Alipore in Misc. Case No.3 of 2006 arising out of the Matrimonial Suit No.17 of 2006.

2. THE opposite instituted a suit being matrimonial suit no.230 of 2005 (subsequently renumbered as Matrimonial Suit No.17 of 2006) before the learned District Judge, Alipore for dissolution of marriage. THE petitioner herein entered appearance in the said suit and she is contesting the said suit by filing a written statement. She also filed an application under Section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 for alimony pendente lite for herself, her son and also litigation costs. That application for alimony was converted into the misc. case no.3 of 2006 and that was disposed of on July 28, 2009 by passing the impugned order granting alimony at the rate of Rs.3,000/- per month for the petitioner, Rs.3,000/- per month for her minor son and the litigation costs of Rs.8,000/-. Being aggrieved by such orders, this application has been preferred. Mr. Bhattacharya, learned Advocate appe




Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top