SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2011 Supreme(Cal) 676

PRATAP KUMAR RAY, MD.ABDUL GHANI
Saira Bibi – Appellant
Versus
State 82 – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Dilip Kumar Samanta, Ashis Kumar Pal, B.P.Samanta, Gita Mukherjee

JUDGMENT

Pratap Kumar Ray, J.

1. HEARD learned Advocates appearing for the parties.

2. LET paper books as filed today be kept with the record.

This case has a chequered history.

3. A Title Suit being No. 186 of 1990 filed in the Court of Assistant District Judge, 1st Court, Midnapore being a suit for declaration, injunction and partition of schedule property, wherein a preliminary decree on 24th May, 1995, declaring the plaintiffs right, title and interest over the property to the extent of 7/32nd share in respect of the suit property was passed. Said preliminary decree, due to amicable settlement in between the parties, was declared in final form and a final decree was passed by accepting compromise petition on 13th May, 1999, filed in the said suit, by the Court of Civil Judge (Senior Division), Midnapore. On that basis, the present writ petitioner filed application praying for revision of record of rights prepared under the Estate Acquisition Act, 1953.

4. AN Original Application being No. O.A. 2932 of 2002 (LRTT) was moved before the West Bengla Land Reforms and Tenancy Tribunal who by the order dated 3rd October, 2002 passed an order directing the concerned Revenue Officer to di










Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top