SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2011 Supreme(Cal) 881

PRASENJIT MANDAL
Arun Kumar Paul – Appellant
Versus
Alipta Paul – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Ashis Kumar Roy, Abhishek Banerjee, Aniruddha Chatterjee

JUDGMENT

1. Prasenjit Mandal, J. Challenge is to the order dated April 19, 2011 passed by the learned Additional District Judge, 5th Court, Alipore in Matrimonial Suit No.14 of 2001 thereby directing the petitioner to pay alimony at the enhanced rate to the opposite party.

2. THE short fact is that the petitioner was married to opposite party in the year 1998 and one child was born in the wedlock. Due to some matrimonial problems, the petitioner filed a matrimonial suit for dissolution of marriage by a decree of divorce. THE opposite party entered an appearance and she is contesting the said matrimonial suit. She filed an application claiming maintenance.

Upon hearing both the sides, the learned Trial Judge granted alimony of Rs.600/- per month more, in addition to the alimony already granted in favour of the opposite party in a proceeding under Section 125 of the Cr.P.C. to the extent of Rs.2200/-, so that the total maintenance would will become Rs.2800/- per month for herself and the child. Being aggrieved by that order, the wife referred a revisional application for enhancement of the alimony and this Hon’ble Court enhanced the amount to Rs.3000/- per month for herself and her mi







Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top