SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2011 Supreme(Cal) 939

RAGHUNATH RAY
K. Khalid – Appellant
Versus
Sajeeda Khalid – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Ananda Haider, Prasanth, S.K. Mandal, M.A. Rehman

JUDGMENT

Raghunath Ray, J.

1. BY preferring this application under section 482 Cr PC, the petitioner husband has sought to challenge the judgment and order dated 28.3.2011, passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Andaman and Nicobar Islands, Port Blair in Criminal Revision No. 003 of 2011, whereby the learned revisional court affirmed the judgment and order dated 2.12.2010, passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate, First Class-II, Port Blair in Misc. Case No. 131 of 2009. In the present application, the petitioner husband has, however, prayed for setting aside the judgment impugned and remanding the case back to the learned trial Court for adjudication of the matter after taking evidence of vital witnesses including the petitioner husband afresh.

2. THE relevant facts giving rise to this criminal revision may be capsulised as under: Smti. Sajeeda Khalid (OP No. 1 herein) and her minor son Kumar K. Naushad (OP No.2 herein) instituted a Misc. Case No. 131 of 2009 under section 125 Cr PC, claiming maintenance at the rate of Rs. 10,000/- per month in total for them from the petitioner. It is contended inter alia therein, that the marriage between the petitioner and the OP No. 1 was solemn










































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top