RAGHUNATH RAY
K. Khalid – Appellant
Versus
Sajeeda Khalid – Respondent
Raghunath Ray, J.
1. BY preferring this application under section 482 Cr PC, the petitioner husband has sought to challenge the judgment and order dated 28.3.2011, passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Andaman and Nicobar Islands, Port Blair in Criminal Revision No. 003 of 2011, whereby the learned revisional court affirmed the judgment and order dated 2.12.2010, passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate, First Class-II, Port Blair in Misc. Case No. 131 of 2009. In the present application, the petitioner husband has, however, prayed for setting aside the judgment impugned and remanding the case back to the learned trial Court for adjudication of the matter after taking evidence of vital witnesses including the petitioner husband afresh.
2. THE relevant facts giving rise to this criminal revision may be capsulised as under: Smti. Sajeeda Khalid (OP No. 1 herein) and her minor son Kumar K. Naushad (OP No.2 herein) instituted a Misc. Case No. 131 of 2009 under section 125 Cr PC, claiming maintenance at the rate of Rs. 10,000/- per month in total for them from the petitioner. It is contended inter alia therein, that the marriage between the petitioner and the OP No. 1 was solemn
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.