SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2010 Supreme(Cal) 644

PRASENJIT MANDAL
Sonali Chatterjee – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF WEST BENGAL – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Kallol Mondal, Krishan Roy, S.S. Roy

JUDGMENT

1. AFFIDAVIT-of-service filed by the petitioner be kept with the record. Service has been effected upon the private opposite party and the State; but none appeared on behalf of the private opposite party. So the matter is taken up for hearing.

2. THIS application is directed against the order dated 26th May, 2008 passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate, Fifth Court, Hooghly in N.G.R. Case No.3429 of 2006, thereby dropping the proceeding under section 258 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.

3. THE de facto complainant of the Bandel P.P.G.D.E. No. 236 dated 09.03.2005 under section 323 of the IPC has preferred this revisional application. His contention is that he is the victim of the case but the learned Magistrate after examination of one formal witness closed the prosecution case without examining the other witnesses including himself. Thus, he did not get any opportunity to ventilate his grievance in the said N.G.R. case. He has prayed for vacating/setting aside the order dated 26.05.2008.

4. THE learned Advocate for the petitioner submits that though he was the victim for offence under section 323 of the IPC the learned Magistrate did not examine him at all at the






Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top