SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2010 Supreme(Cal) 643

I.P.MUKERJI
Sahar Banu – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF WEST BENGAL – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Yasin Ali, Yusuf Ali, Harun-Al-Rashid, K.M.Hossain, Tapabrata Chakraborty, Kumaresh Dalal

JUDGMENT

1. A very interesting point has arise in this writ application. A widow of a deceased State employee, who got married to the employee after his retirement, claims family pension. The question is whether such widow is entitled to family pension.

2. THE concerned employee retired on 1st February, 1996. He married the petitioner on 14th November, 1998 and died on 26th August, 2002. THE petitioner/ widow made a claim for such pension which was rejected on 22nd March, 2003. THE writ petitioner has come up before the Court from such rejection. Fortunately, the position has been clarified by the notification dated 20th March, 2006 of the Government of West Bengal which clarifies that "widow" includes "post retiral spouse".

3. THEREFORE, the writ petitioner is entitled to be treated as "widow" of the deceased employee for the purpose of family pension. I declare so.

4. THEREFORE, I direct the respondent No. 5 to release family pension and other related benefits not already paid, in accordance with law, in accordance with the above observations and findings, within a period of eight weeks from the date of communication of this order. The writ application is accordingly disposed of.


Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top