SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2010 Supreme(Cal) 633

ASHIM KUMAR ROY
Indrajit Mukherjee – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Monoj Malhotra, Santanu Kumar Mitra, Krishna Ghosh

JUDGMENT

1. THIS criminal revision is directed against an order passed by the Learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bidhannagar, North 24-Parganas in connection with G.R. Case No. 142 of 2009 arising out of Bidhan Nagar P.S. Case No. 18 of 2009 under Sections 341/323/324/307/506/34/354 of the Indian Penal Code, whereby the Learned Magistrate rejected the petitioners prayer for grant of no objection for Passport.

2. IT appears that the present petitioner is an employee of a private company, viz. Cognizant. IT further appears from the materials on record that after the petitioner successfully completed on boarding formalities he was asked by his employer to produce original documents relating to its educational qualification including his Passport etc. The petitioner not having Passport, while pursuing for the same found according to the statutory rules he was required to furnish along with his application for Passport, the details of criminal cases, if any, pending against him and if any such case is pending, then in that case to submit a no objection certificate to be issued by the concerned Court. Since the petitioner was arraigned an accused in connection with the aforesai


Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top