SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2010 Supreme(Cal) 459

I.P.MUKERJI
Diamond Infotech Private Limited – Appellant
Versus
Kolkata Municipal Corporation – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Samit Talukdar, Suman Dutta, Raghunath Chakraborty

JUDGMENT:

I.P.Mukerji, J.

1. THE writ petitioner is aggrieved by a distress warrant issued by the respondent corporation on 6th November, 2008. By this distress warrant the writ petitioner's flat No. 16 measuring 1892 sq.ft. super built up area on 1, R.N. Mukherjee Road. Kolkata -1 has been attached for non-payment of municipal tax, penalty and interest amounting to Rs. 14,00,157.13. THE writ petitioner bought this flat on 7th January, 2008 from the respondent No. 6 by a deed of conveyance.

2. THE writ petitioner says that he is an innocent purchaser and that such attachment ought not to have been made.

Learned Counsel appearing for the writ petitioner submits that the transferor did not give notice of transfer of the flat to the Municipal Commissioner and that by sub-section (4) of section 183 continues to be liable for payment of the property tax.

3. LEARNED Counsel for the respondent corporation draws my attention to sub-section (1) of section 183 which says that both the transferor and the transferee have concurrent obligations to notify the corporation within three months of the execution of conveyance about the transfer.

4. IN this case, the transferor has admittedly not notifi







Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top