SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2010 Supreme(Cal) 919

JYOTIRMAY BHATTACHARYA
Md. Jamil Akhter – Appellant
Versus
Abdul Majid – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Pankaj Haider, Shib Nath Ganguly, Tarak Nath Haldar

JUDGMENT

1. THE judgment of the Court was as follows: THE plaintiff filed a suit for eviction against the defendant on termination of his licence. THE defendant is contesting the said suit by filing written statement. In such a suit, the defendant filed an application challenging the jurisdiction of the learned Trial Judge to try the instant suit after the promulgation of the West Bengal Thika Tenancy (Acquisition and Regulation) Act, 2001. (Acquisition and Regulation) Act, 2001.

2. THE learned Trial Judge rejected the defendant's said application by holding inter alia that the suit for eviction of a licensee is neither hit by Section 8 sub-section (3) nor hit by Section 21 of the said Act. THE learned Trial Judge, thus, held that the suit is very much maintainable before the Civil Court. Accordingly, the petitioner's application was rejected by the learned Trial Judge by the order being No. 45 dated 7th May, 2010.

The propriety of the said order is under challenge in this application under Article 227 of the Constitution of India at the instance of the defendant/petitioner.

3. AFTER hearing the learned Advocate for the parties and after considering the materials-on-record, this Co

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top