SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2010 Supreme(Cal) 1470

High Court Of Calcutta
Jyotirmay Bhattacharya, J.

Tarubala Naskar : Appellant
Versus
United India Insurance Co. Ltd. : Respondent
CO. No. 2117 of 2010
Decided On : Dec 23,2010

Advocates Appeared:
Jayanta Kumar Mondal, Rajesh Singh

Failure to deposit the modified awarded amount within the specified time renders the insurance company liable to pay interest as per the original award.

Headnote:

Motor Vehicles Act - Compensation - Interest on awarded amount

Fact of the Case:

The insurance company filed an appeal against the awarded compensation, which was modified by the Division Bench of the Court. The insurance company failed to deposit the modified awarded amount within 30 days from the date of disposal of the appeal.

Finding of the Court:

The court held that the insurance company cannot avoid payment of interest on the modified awarded amount at the rate of 12 per cent per annum from the date of filing of the claim petition till realization of the money.

Issues: The issue was whether the insurance company was liable to pay interest on the modified awarded amount for failing to deposit it within 30 days from the date of disposal of the appeal.

Ratio Decidendi: The court found that the insurance company's failure to deposit the modified awarded amount within the specified time rendered it liable to pay interest as per the original award.

Final Decision: The impugned order was set aside, and the executing court was directed to proceed with the execution case for realization of the unpaid interest amount from the insurance company. The revision petition was allowed.

JUDGMENT

Jyotirmay Bhattacharya, J.

1. THE petitioners' application under section 166 of Motor Vehicles Act giving rise to M.A.C. Case No. 34 of 1997 was allowed on contest against the insurance company with costs of Rs. 6,000 to be paid by insurance company and ex parte against the rest without cost. The learned Tribunal directed the insurance company to pay compensation to the tune of Rs. 5,32,660 to the claimants. Mode of payment of the awarded amount was also prescribed in the said award. It was also provided in the said award that if the said awarded amount is not paid by the insurance company to the claimants within 30 days from the date of passing of the said award, then the awarded amount will carry interest at the rate of 12 per cent per annum from the date of filing of the said case till realization of the said money.

2. INSURANCE company was not satisfied with the said award. Hence, the insurance company filed an appeal being F.M.A.T. No. 3588 of 1999. The said appeal was disposed of by the Division Bench of this Honourable Court on 17.6.2002. The judgment which was impugned in the said appeal was modified to the extent that the awarded compensation will be to the tune of Rs. 4,82,660 instead of Rs. 5,32,660 as contained in the ordering portion of the impugned order. The remaining part of the said award which was impugned in the said appeal remained undisturbed. As a result, insurance company was required to pay the said compensation money of Rs. 4,82,660 within 30 days from the date of disposal of the said appeal. The provision relating to payment of interest which was provided in the original award in the event of failure to deposit the awarded amount within 30 days from the date of disposal of the claim petition remained undisturbed in appeal. Thus, if it is found that the insurance company has failed to deposit the modified awarded amount within 30 days from the date of disposal of the appeal, insurance company cannot avoid its liability for payment of interest in terms of the award of the Tribunal which was affirmed in appeal.

The said appeal was disposed of on 17.6.2002. The modified awarded amount was deposited by the insurance company on 26.9.2002. Thus, this court has no hesitation to hold that the modified awarded amount was deposited after 30 days from the date of the disposal of the appeal. As a result, this court is of the view that the insurance company cannot avoid payment of interest on the modified awarded amount at the rate of 12 per cent per annum from the date of filing of the claim petition till realization of the said money.

3. MR. Rajesh Singh, learned advocate appearing for the insurance company, submits that the rate of interest which was awarded by the learned Tribunal is too much exorbitant and as such the rate of interest should be reduced to 8 per cent per annum.

4. THIS court cannot accept such submission of Mr. Singh for the simple reason that if such prayer of insurance company is allowed then such order of this court will amount to alteration of the ultimate award which was passed by the Division Bench of the Honourable court. Since the ultimate award passed by the Division Bench of this Honourable court in the aforesaid appeal remains unchallenged and further since this court sitting singly is not in a position to modify the ultimate award passed by the Division Bench of this Honourable court, the submission of Mr. Singh cannot be accepted.

The impugned order is set aside. The learned executing court is directed to proceed with the execution case for realization of the unpaid interest amount from the insurance company.

5. THE revisional application is thus allowed.

6. URGENT xerox certified copy of this order, if applied for, be given to the parties on priority basis.

Revision petition allowed.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top