SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2010 Supreme(Cal) 79

High Court of Calcutta
Ashim Kumar Roy, J.
Ichaque Gazi – Appellant
Versus
State of West Bengal – Respondent
C.R.R. No. 4631 of 2009
Decided On: Feb 01, 2010

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
Kallol Kumar Basu, Arijeet Pyne, Minati Gomes.

The DNA Test report, conducted at the behest of the Investigating Agency, should be supplied to the accused in accordance with Section 54A of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

Headnote:

DNA Test - Criminal Procedure - The court directed the report of the DNA Test to be supplied to the accused persons in accordance with Section 54A of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner was facing trial for an offence under Section 376 of the Indian Penal Code. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner's rape of the victim resulted in her pregnancy and childbirth. The petitioner requested the DNA Test report, but the court rejected the prayer.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the DNA Test report, done at the behest of the Investigating Agency, should be treated as part of the document referred to in Section 173 of the Code of Criminal Procedure and should be supplied to the accused.

Issues: The issue was whether the DNA Test report should be supplied to the accused, as the prosecution was not relying on it.

Ratio Decidendi: The court relied on Section 54A of the Code of Criminal Procedure, which mandates the report of such tests to be treated as part of the document referred to in Section 173, and directed the report to be supplied to the accused.

Final Decision: The order impugned was set aside, and the court directed the report of the DNA Test to be supplied to the accused persons within fifteen days. The criminal revisional application was allowed.

Judgment

1. HEARD Mr. Kallol Kumar Basu, learned Advocate, appeared on behalf of the petitioner as well as Ms. Minati Gomes, learned Advocate, appeared on behalf of the State. Perused the materials on record.

2. MR. Basu submitted that the present petitioner has been facing his trial for an offence punishable under Section 376 of the Indian Penal Code before the Learned Additional Sessions Judge, Fast Track; 1st Court, Basirhat, North 24-Parganas. He further submitted that it is the case of the prosecution that due to the rape committed by the petitioner upon the victim girl, she became pregnant and gave birth to a child. He further submitted that after filing of the charge-sheet, on the prayer of the Investigating Officer, blood sample was taken for DNA Test from the accused, i.e., the petitioner herein, the victim girl and her newly borne baby. Thereafter, DNA Test was done but no report of DNA Test was furnished to the. petitioner. Accordingly, the petitioner moved the Court for the said DNA Test report but the learned Judge rejected such prayer. On the other hand, Ms. Minati Gomes submitted that since the prosecution is not relying on the DNA Test report, therefore, there is no question of supplying it to the accused persons.

Heard the learned Advocates appeared on behalf of the parties. Considered their respective submissions.

3. IT appears from the materials on record that DNA Test was done at the behest of the Investigating Agency and in terms of Section 54A of the Code of Criminal Procedure, the report of such test to be treated as the part of the document referred to in Clause (a) of sub- section (5) of Section 173 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, accordingly, the said report ought to be supplied to the accused.

4. IN view of above, the order impugned is set aside. The learned Court below is directed to supply the report of the DNA Test to the accused persons within fifteen days from the date of communication of this order. It is further directed, the Court shall not proceed to frame charge without supplying the DNA Test report to the petitioner.

This criminal revisional application thus, stands, allowed.

5. CRIMINAL Section is directed to deliver urgent Photostat certified copy of this Judgment to the parties, if applied for, as early as possible.


Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

AI

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top