High Court Of Calcutta
Pranab Kumar Chattopadhyay, Md.Abdul Ghani, JJ.
Secretary Of The Managing Committee
Vs.
Archana Ghosh
Appeal No : M.A.T. 592 of 2010 C.A.N. 4147 of 2010
Decided on : July 09, 2010
SCHOOL SERVICE COMMISSION - APPOINTMENT - SELECTION - GROUP D POST - LADY ATTENDANT - WEST BENGAL SCHOOL SERVICE COMMISSION ACT - SCHOOL SERVICE COMMISSION (SELECTION OF PERSONS FOR APPOINTMENT TO THE POST OF NON-TEACHING STAFF) RULES - WEST BENGAL SCHOOLS (CONTROL OF EXPENDITURE) ACT - WEST BENGAL SCHOOL (RECRUITMENT OF NON-TEACHING STAFF) RULES - APPLICABILITY - DATE OF VACANCY - PRE-EXISTING RULES OR AMENDED PROVISIONS.
Fact of the Case:
The case involved a dispute over the procedure to be followed for filling up a vacant Group D post of Lady Attendant in Kalinagar Girls High School. The vacancy arose on 31st May, 2006, and prior permission for filling it was granted by the District Inspector of Schools on 25th September, 2007. The Employment Exchange sponsored a list of 35 eligible candidates on 27th March, 2008, which did not include the respondent. On 31st January, 2009, an advertisement was issued inviting applications for the post, and the school authority received several applications, including that of the respondent. The Managing Committee of the school asked the candidates to appear for an interview in August 2009.
Finding of the Court:
The Court held that the selection process for filling up the vacant Group D post of Lady Attendant in the concerned school should be governed by the West Bengal School (Recruitment of Non-teaching Staff) Rules, 2005, which were in force when the vacancy arose. The Court relied on the Supreme Court's decisions in Y.V. Rangaiah and Ors. vs. J. Sreenivasa Rao and Ors., State of Rajasthan vs. R. Dayal and Ors., and Arjun Singh Rathore vs. B.N. Chaturvedi and Ors., which held that vacancies that occurred prior to the amendment of the Rules would be governed by the original Rules, and not by the amended Rules.
Issues: 1. Whether the Group D post of Lady Attendant in Kalinagar Girls High School should be filled up by the West Bengal School Service Commission following the provisions of the West Bengal School Service Commission (Amendment) Act, 2008, or the pre-existing statutory procedures. 2. Whether the selection process for filling up the said vacancy should be completed under the 2005 Rules or the amended provisions of the West Bengal School Service Commission Act and Rules.
Ratio Decidendi: The Court held that the date on which the vacancy arose is relevant to decide whether the original Rules or the amended Rules will govern the selection. Since the vacancy in the Group D post of Lady Attendant in the concerned school arose on 31st May, 2006, i.e., prior to the commencement of the West Bengal School Service Commission (Amendment) Act, 2008, the West Bengal School Service Commission (Selection of Persons for Appointment to the Post of Non-Teaching Staff) Rules, 2009, and the West Bengal Schools (Control of Expenditure) (Amendment) Act, 2008, the selection in question should be governed by the 2005 Rules.
Final Decision: The Court dismissed the appeal and directed the school authority to forward the panel prepared by the Selection Committee to the District Inspector of Schools (SE), Nadia, for obtaining necessary approval. The District Inspector of Schools was also directed to act on the basis thereof.
PRANAB KUMAR CHATTOPADHYAY, J.
1. THE principal question that arises for our consideration in this appeal is whether the Group D post of Lady Attendant in Kalinagar Girls High School should be filled up by the West Bengal School Service Commission following the provisions of the West Bengal School Service Commission (Amendment) Act, 2008 which came into force on January 1, 2009 or the said vacancy should be filled up following the pre-existing statutory procedures. In other words, the real issue to be decided in the present appeal is whether the vacant post of Group D staff in the concerned school should be filled up following the statutory procedure which was in vogue prior to the commencement of the said West Bengal School Service Commission (Amendment) Act, 2008.
2. THE facts which gave rise to this appeal are briefly stated hereinafter: THE Group D post of Lady Attendant fell vacant in the concerned school on 31st May, 2006. THE concerned District Inspector of Schools granted prior permission for filling up the said Group D post of Lady Attendant on 25th September, 2007. After the issuance of the aforesaid prior permission, the school authority sent requisition to the Employment Exchange for sponsoring the names of the eligible candidates and the concerned Employment Exchange also in response to such request forwarded a list sponsoring the names of 35 candidates on March 27, 2008. In the said list of 35 sponsored candidates the name of the respondent No. 1/writ petitioner was not included. After the grant of prior permission by the District Inspector of Schools concerned in the year 2007 and sponsoring of 35 names by the Employment Exchange in the year 2008, no further steps were taken for filling up the said vacant Group D post of Lady Attendant during the subsequent couple of months. However, on 31st January, 2009 an advertisement was issued in the newspaper inviting applications from the eligible candidates for filling up the said vacancy. In response to the said advertisement, several candidates including the respondent No. 1/writ petitioner herein submitted applications and the Managing Committee of the school asked those candidates including the said respondent No. 1 to appear at the interview which was fixed in the month of August, 2009. The respondent No. 1/writ petitioner herein, however, filed a writ petition alleging inaction on the part of the Managing Committee of the Kalinagar Girls High School for non-submission of the panel of selected candidates in respect of the non-teaching Group D post of Lady Attendant to the District Inspector of Schools (SE), Nadia for its approval. According to the appellant, no panel for filling up the said Group D post of Lady Attendant in the concerned school was prepared and, therefore, the Managing Committee of the said school had no occasion to forward any panel and/or papers in relation to the said selection to the District Inspector of Schools (SE), Nadia.
3. THE aforesaid writ petition filed by the respondent No. 1 herein was ultimately disposed of on merits by the judgment and order under appeal passed by a learned Judge of this Court whereby and whereunder the school authority was directed to forward the panel prepared by the Selection Committee for filling up the said Group D post of Lady Attendant to the District Inspector of Schools concerned.
4. CHALLENGING the aforesaid direction passed by the learned Single Judge of this court, Secretary of the Managing Committee of the said school filed the present appeal and the connected Stay Application. We have heard the learned Counsel of the respective parties in connection with the aforesaid appeal as well as the connected Stay Application. By consent of the learned Counsel of the respective parties, both the appeal and the connected Stay Application were heard together.
5. MR. Kashi Kanta Moitra, learned Senior Counsel representing the appellant submitted that the members of the Managing Committee of the said school h
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.