SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2010 Supreme(Cal) 218

KANCHAN CHAKRABORTY
Jiarul Mondal Alias Julhas – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF WEST BENGAL – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Tarun Kanti Haider, Rabi Sankar Chattopadhyay

JUDGMENT

1. THE challenge in this revision application under Section 397, 401 read with Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code is to the legality and validity of the proceeding in G.R. Case No. 292/2005 arising out of Gaighata P.S. Case No. 64 dated 17.4.2005 under Section 403/406/409, IPC lying in the Court of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bongoan. The petitioners Jiarul Mondal and Nijanur Rahaman Biswas have taken out this application with a prayer to quash the entire proceedings on the following grounds:

a) that they being 'public servants' under Section 8 read with Section 2(31)of the WBCS Act, 1983 vis-a-vis Section 21 of the Indian Penal Code, can not be prosecuted in the Criminal Court ordinarily having jurisdiction over the alleged incident;

b) that in view of Section 139(3) of the WBCS Act 1983, previous sanction of the Registrar of Co-operative Society is required to be obtained prior to lunching the Criminal Prosecution against the petitioners, which was not done;

c) that a civil dispute over the selfsame issue was initiated and disposed of by the ARCS, Tamluk, Midnapur in which the petitioners were found not responsible for the alleged anomalies in the























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top