SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2010 Supreme(Cal) 1136

ASHIM KUMAR ROY
Meghla Biswas – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF WEST BENGAL – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Abhijit Chakraborty, Subir Kumar Ghosh, Krishnakali Swar, Debasish Mallick Chowdhury, Meghala Biswas

JUDGMENT

1. IN C.R.R. No. 1906 of 2010 while the petitioner, who has been facing his trial before the Learned Metropolitan Magistrate, 17th Court, Calcutta in connection with the Case No. C-2329/06 relating to an offence punishable under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act has approached this Court seeking a relief by way of stay of all further proceedings of the aforesaid complaint case on the ground, over the self-same facts a civil suit is pending between the parties before the Hon'ble High Court at Calcutta. IN C.R.R. No. 1524 of 2010 the complainant of the aforesaid case approached this Court for a direction for expeditious conclusion of the said trial on the ground that the same is pending in violation of mandate of sub-section (3) of Section 143 of the Negotiable Instruments Act as directed earlier both the criminal revisions are taken up for hearing together.

2. HEARD the Learned Counsels appearing on behalf of the parties. Perused the materials on record.

According to the learned advocate of the petitioner, in C.R.R. No. 1906 of 2010 that after dishonour of a cheque of Rs. 6 lakhs which she issued in favour of the opposite party, on January 16, 2006 her husband we




Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top