High Court Of Calcutta
S.S. Nijjar, Biswanath Somadder, JJ.
Forum For Human, Legal And Ecological Rights, Bansdroni : Appellant
Versus
State Of West Bengal : Respondent
W.P. No. 1614 of 2008
Decided On : Sep 07, 2009
The Court examined the issue of whether the Government of West Bengal had shown such lack of awareness of the problem of environment in making an allotment of land for the construction of a Five Star Hotel at the expense of the zoological garden that it warrants interference by the Court. The Court examined the entire issue on merits and found no cause for unnecessary apprehensions as expressed by the writ petitioners. The Court held that a bare perusal of the lease deed would itself demonstrate that the project was conceived as a commercial venture from its very inception. The Court held that if the development of the project is stopped, it would be a disservice to the city of Kolkata and that an effort has been made by the authorities to develop a world-class facility. The Court dismissed the writ petition with no order as to costs.
Fact of the Case:
Government of West Bengal allotted land for the construction of a Five Star Hotel at the expense of the zoological garden known as "Swabhumi". The petitioners, a forum for Human, Legal and Ecological Rights, filed a writ petition seeking to protect the first heritage plaza of Kolkata known as "Swabhumi". The petitioners alleged that the allotment of land was made without inviting tenders from willing persons and without complying with certain provisions of the Land Manual. It was further submitted that in taking a decision to take away the land from the Zoo and to lease the same to the Taj Group of Hotels, relevant considerations had been ignored and irrelevant considerations had been taken into account.
Finding of the Court:
The Court found that the Government of West Bengal had taken into account all relevant considerations and that there was no mala fide intention in making the allotment of land. The Court also found that the proposed development would not interfere in any manner with the animals in the Zoo and the birds arriving at the Zoo or otherwise disturb the ecology.
Issues: 1. Whether the Government of West Bengal had shown such lack of awareness of the problem of environment in making an allotment of land for the construction of a Five Star Hotel at the expense of the zoological garden that it warrants interference by the Court. 2. Whether the allotment of land was made without inviting tenders from willing persons and without complying with certain provisions of the Land Manual. 3. Whether in taking a decision to take away the land from the Zoo and to lease the same to the Taj Group of Hotels, relevant considerations had been ignored and irrelevant considerations had been taken into account.
Ratio Decidendi: 1. The Court held that the Government of West Bengal had taken into account all relevant considerations and that there was no mala fide intention in making the allotment of land. 2. The Court held that the proposed development would not interfere in any manner with the animals in the Zoo and the birds arriving at the Zoo or otherwise disturb the ecology. 3. The Court held that the writ petition was not maintainable as the petitioners had no locus standi to file the writ petition.
Final Decision: The Court dismissed the writ petition with no order as to costs.
Nijjar, CJ.
1. THIS petition has been filed by the forum for Human, Legal and Ecological Rights, Bansdroni through its General Secretary, in public interest, seeking to protect the first heritage plaza of Kolkata known as "Swabhumi".
2. BEFORE we consider the entire issue, we deem it appropriate to reproduce the observations of O. Chinnappa Reddy, J. in the case of Shri Sachidanand Pandey v. State of West Bengal [AIR 1987 Supreme Court 1109]. In the aforesaid judgment, the Supreme Court emphasizes the importance of environment as understood by the native Indians of North America. A reply sent by an Indian Chief to the President of the United States of America was reproduced by the Supreme Court verbatim. In our opinion, the facts in the present case warrant that the reply of the Indian Chief be made a preface to this judgment. It reads as follows :- "(2) A hundred and thirty-two years ago, in 1854, 'the wise Indian Chief of Seattle' replied to the offer of 'the great White Chief in Washington' to buy their land. The reply is profound. It is beautiful. It is timeless. It contains the wisdom of the ages. It is the first ever and the most understanding statement on environment. It is worth quoting. To abridge it or to quote extracts from it is to destroy its beauty. You cannot scratch a painting and not diminish its beauty. We will quote the whole of it: "How can you buy or sell the sky, the warmth of the land? The idea is strange to us. If we do not own the freshness of the air and the sparkle of the water, how can you buy them? Every part of the earth is sacred to my people. Every shining pine needle, every sandy shore, every mist in the dark woods, every clearing and humming insect is holy in memory and experience of my people. The sap which courses through the trees carries the memories of the red man. The white man's dead forget the country of their birth when they go to walk among the stars. Our dead never forget this beautiful earth, for it is the mother of the red man. We are part of the earth and it is part of us. The perfumed flowers are our sisters; the horse, the great eagle, these are our brothers. The rocky crests, the juices in the meadows, the body heat of the pony, and man-all belong to the same family. So, when the Great Chief in Washington sends word and he wishes to buy our land, he asks much of us. The Great Chief sends word he will reserve us a place so that we can live comfortably to ourselves. He will be our father and we will be his 'children. So we will consider your offer to buy our land. But it will not be easy. For this land is sacred to us. This shining water moves in the streams and rivers is not just water but the blood of our ancestors. If we sell you land, you must remember that it is sacred and you must teach your children that it is sacred and that each ghostly reflection in the clear water of the lakes tells of events and memories in the life of my people. The water's murmur is the voice of my father's father. The rivers are our brothers, they quench our thirst. The rivers carry our canoes, and feed our children. If we sell you our land, you must remember, and teach your children, that the rivers are our brothers, and yours and you must henceforth give the kindness you would give any brother. We know that the white man does not understand our ways. One portion of land is the same to him as the next, for he is a stranger who comes in the night and takes from the land whatever he needs. The earth is not his brother but his enemy, and when he has conquered it, he moves on. He leaves his father's graves behind, and he does not care. He kidnaps the earth from his children. His father's grave and his children's birthright are forgotten. He treats his mother, the earth, and his brother, the sky, as things to be bought, plundered, sold like sheep or bright beads. His appetite will devour the earth and leave behind only a desert. I do not know. Our ways are different from your ways. The sight o
AI
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.