SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2008 Supreme(Cal) 1043

B.Bhattacharya, Rudrendra Nath Banerjee
Brinda Routh – Appellant
Versus
United India Insurance Company Ltd. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Kamal Krishna Das, Krishanu Banik,

JUDGMENT:

1. THIS appeal is at the instance of the claimants in a proceeding under Section 163a of the Motor Vehicles Act and is directed against the award dated 29th June, 2005 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, burdwan, in M. A. C. Case No. 85 of 2004 thereby disposing of the said proceeding by awarding a sum of Rs. 1,60,500/- to the claimants to be paid by the United India Insurance Company Ltd.

2. BEING dissatisfied, the claimants have come up with the present appeal.

There is no dispute that the victim was the "khalasi" of an oil-tanker which collided with a lorry resulting in his death. In the claim-application under section 163a of the Motor Vehicles Act, the claimants, his heirs and legal representatives, however, made the owner of the oil-tanker and its insurer as parties to the proceedings without impleading either the owner or the insurer of the lorry as parties. The claimants alleged that the victim used to earn Rs. 3,000/- a month, as an employee, from the owner of the oil-tanker.

3. THE claim-application was contested both by the owner of the oil-tanker and its insurer by filing separate written statement.

4. AT the time of hearing, the owner of the oil-tank














Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top