SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1998 Supreme(Cal) 364

BARIN GHOSH
Reckitt And Colman Of India Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
M. P. Ramchandran – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Sarkar M.K. Gautam Chakraborty

JUDGMENT

Barin Ghosh, J.

1. IN the plaint the plaintiff has prayed, inter alia, for perpetual injunction restraining the defendants from further publishing the advertisements contained in Annexure 'B' to the plaint or any other similar advertisement making disparaging reference to the plaintiff's Robin Liquid Blue. IN the present application, the plaintiff has prayed for, inter alia, a temporary injunction of similar nature. On 1st February, 1996 the present application was moved before me ex parte, when I passed an order of injunction of the nature indicated above.

2. IN support of the said Order I recorded the following reasons :-

"The plaintiff is the manufacturer of a whitener sold under the brand-name Robin Blue. The defendants are also manufacturing a whitener and selling their product under the brand-name Ujala. It is the case of the plaintiff that for the purpose of promoting the sale of Ujala the defendant are seeking to project as if the goods of the plaintiff are inferior to that of the defendants. I have been shown certain advertisements from which it appears that although the name of the plaintiff or the brand name of the plaintiff has not been mentioned in the containe


























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top